Discuss the ways horror films are produced and distributed.
Industrial and independent films are produced and distributed differently by their respective companies. When it comes to horror films, they generally have a set of codes and conventions for each sub-genre, that predetermines a lot of the factors of production. For example if a company knows they’re making a slasher film, the chances are they’ll be a hidden villain who seeks revenge, with a hand help weapon like a knife and an innocent final girl who challenges the villain, and defeats him at the end.
Orphan
Industrial companies like Warner Bros benefit from being part of a conglomerate company, in their case, Time Warner Inc. This helps them to produce and distribute film due to their increased expertise as a whole company. One of the recent horror films Warner Bros were behind was “Orphan” (Collet-Serra, 2009).
- The film was produced in partnership with Leonardo DiCaprio, and distributed by Warner Bros.
- The budget for Orphan is not been stated by Warner Bros, however it is estimated to be very high, at around $20 million.
- The film was shot in Canada, in the cities of Burlington, Toronto, Port Hope and Montreal.
- While shooting the film, there were several different scenes that were shot that were then cut in the edit. This includes alternate endings and variations of the script. For example, Esther hanging another orphan child near the start, and her being shot at the end.
- The film was released on the 24th July, 2009 in the United States
- It was released on DVD and Blu-ray on October 27, 2009 in the US by Warner Home Video.
- It was released on DVD and Blu-ray in the UK on November 27 by Optimum Releasing.
- The home media versions include alternate scenes and clips, and the alternate ending.
- The film made back over $78 million, so is therefore seen as a success, as it is over 3 times the budget.
- Although the film was distributed by Warner Bros, they didn't take huge advantage of all their subsidiaries, and didn't use their available synergistic promotion activity to its full potential.
- There are no websites or forums for the film, and there was no real use of viral marketing to promote its release. This is very ineffective, as these methods are all important to the distribution of horror films.
- One thing to remember with horror films is that there is a stock audience of male 15-25 year old's, and they are usually a dedicated horror audience. Because of this, there is a lesser need to advertise as much.
- The trailer was released to advertise the film to the target audience, and catch people's attention.
- A word of mouth buzz was also created through the use of preview screenings, and the film got a lot of good reviews before it's release.
This film is particularly useful to look at for me because it has a similar theme to what our group is thinking of producing, in the fact that there is an innocent little girl who turns out to be a psychopathic killer (although we are thinking more supernatural).
A Night in the Woods
One of the good things about horror films is that they are generally lower budget and cost less to produce than other genres of film like action for example. This greatly helps independent film companies, and in this case Vertigo Films with "A Night in the Woods" (Parry, 2012).
- Although the film's budget was never stated, it was very low.
- The concept for the film, literally a night in the woods, allows the location to be very minimalistic and therefore very cheap.
- The film is shot in the style of found footage, so is all hand held, POV shots from the actors in the film. This also allows it to be low budget, as they are not large, expensive cameras, and there are no large, expensive shots like tracking, helicopter shots, etc.
- Pro-filmic effects are also used a lot in the film, as opposed to more industrial films that would perhaps add effects in in post production,this again allows the price to stay down.
- Because of the found footage style, Parry thought it best to use an improvised script, so that the actors became more natural while filming themselves. This dramatically reduced the cost by not having a professional script writer.
- The film premiered at the UK film festival Fright Fest in August 2011.
- The film was released on the 7th September 2012.
- Since it's release, the film has been made available on DVD and VOD services.
- As with industrial horror, the target audience is male 15-25 year old's. Because of this, the main marketing strategy was through the use of the trailer, broadcast on Youtube.
- This is a useful way to market film, as it is easy to access and share on varying social media platforms, and used most by the target audience.
- Youtube and social network site are also free, so distribution costs would have been very low.
- The trailer of this film focuses on the conventions of horror, and the scariest moments in the film to entice the target audience.
- There are no websites or forums for the film, and there was no real use of viral marketing to promote its release apart from the youtube trailer. This is very ineffective, as these methods are all important to the distribution of horror films.
This film is also particularly useful to look at for me, because it has a similar style to what our group is thinking of producing. One of these styles in the use of first person shots to identify with the characters, and see from their point of view. The other style is to have the sense of the unknown, and something almost possessed.
Because of technological convergence, anybody is able to produce high quality films for a low budget, through the use of free editing software, and cheap HD consumer cameras. They can then market and distribute the films over the internet and social media sights, which played a huge part in “A Night in the Woods”. However although horror films are low budget in general, larger (industrial) companies can use huge special effects teams and employ big pro filmic stunts, to create a much more realistic, personal feel. This in all creates a very pluralistic media landscape, not only in the genre of horror.
In conclusion, industrial and independent horror films are produced and distributed quite differently, but also quite similarly. They are different in the fact the industrial films have much higher budgets, and are then for example able to employ special effects teams in post production to add certain features that you wouldn't find in independent film. They are similar however because they both target the core horror audience of 15-25 year old males, and spend significantly less on distribution in relation to other genres of film, because horror mainly relies on genre appeal rather than the film itself.